Usuario:ConstanceWarner498 reinle

The publisher's justification for a replacement "edition" is that [www.MyParallelBible.com Chant D'Esperance] was first printed in 1909 added material and published another edition in 1917. but it's an author's preogative to alter his own works, however that definitely does not provide others, more than forty five years when his death, a blank check to create alterations and then sign his name to it!

If we have a tendency to altered the ending of "Macbeth" we would be less than honest to assert that the amendment met Shakespeare's approval.

Secondly, the editors exercised nice liberty in changing attributes of Dr. Scofield's reference work that Dr. Scofield himself felt necessary enough to include in his work. within the introduction to their doubly dishonest 1967 publication they admit such changes.

New Scofield: "Among the changes and enhancements during this edition are: necessary word changes within the text to assist the reader; a changed system of self-pronunciation; revision of the many of the introductions to the books of the Bible, together with designation of the author, theme, and date; a lot of subheadings; clarification of some footnotes, deletion of others, and also the addition of the many new notes;: a lot of marginal references; an entirely new chronology; a new index; a concordance especially ready for this edition; new maps; and additional legible sort. a number of these features are explained below."

By their own words, they admit to altering Dr. Scofield's text (the King James Bible), introduction of books of the Bible, notes, marginal references, chronology and plenty of other options.

[www.MyParallelBible.com Spanish English bilingual bible] offer his approval to these changes? Not unless one among the 9 committee members had the witch of Endor conjure him up as she had Samuel!

In fact, the publisher even admits that the changes created were arbitrary choices of the revision committee.

"Each position taken represents the thinking or conviction of the committee as a bunch."

What are the results of such shenanigans? One example can suffice. let us examine the footnote found in Acts 8:12 of the [www.MyParallelBible.com Haitian Creole Bible] concerning baptism.

"Baptism has, since the apostolic age, been practiced by each major group within the Christian church and, in Protestant communions, is recognized mutually of 2 sacraments - the opposite being the Lord's Supper. Since early within the Church's history 3 completely different modes of baptism have been used: aspersion (sprinkling); affusion (pouring); and immersion (dipping)."

Here we see that the nine revisors (NOT Dr. Scofield) believe that there is a difference between the true Christian church and Protestant "communion". might I ask? When one cluster is defined as "Protestant" what is the other group called?

Secondly, the nine apostate revisors (NOT Dr. Scofield) claim, without scriptural proof that Christians baptize by pouring and sprinkling moreover as immersion.

Remember, the footnote is found in an exceedingly S-C-O-F-I-E-L-D of 1967. A book that claims on its title page that a dead man (Dr. Scofield) is one of its editors.

What does the footnote for Acts 8:12 within the REAL [www.MyParallelBible.com Scofield bible] of 1917 which had a living Dr. Scofield as its editor say?

Nothing. there's no such footnote!

That's right! The New Haitian Creole Bible never approved of and never had in a text anytime in his life time!

I ask you, is that this honest?

Proof that the big print [www.MyParallelBible.com french english Parallel bible] is found on virtually every page where the margin notes the dual Bible reading as "KJV". The text of the New Scofield Bible isn't a King James Bible and it is NOT a Scofield Bible.

It might be noted that in recent years the dimensions and shape of the New Scofield Bible has been changed to additional resemble the Scofield Reference Bible. many Christians who desire a real Scofield Reference Bible have purchased a new Scofield Bible by mistake.